What is a fracher?
Q. I'm looking at a 1900 United States Federal Census report and the relationship to the head of household says "Fracher". What was a fracher?
Asked by ' - Sun Nov 11 11:13:54 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Father (daddy)
Answered by einreb - Mon Nov 12 16:17:25 2007
Q. I'm looking at a 1900 United States Federal Census report and the relationship to the head of household says "Fracher". What was a fracher?
Asked by ' - Sun Nov 11 11:13:54 2007 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Father (daddy)
Answered by einreb - Mon Nov 12 16:17:25 2007
Would you do a look up for me?
Q. 2nd post: If you have an account at Ancestry.com, would you look up the 1900 United States Federal Census for Sherman Bishop and spouse Rachel Bishop. I saw it listed there. But I couldn't get the info. At that time my Sherman and Rachel would have live either in South Carolina or North Carolina. Any help appreciated. oweniscummins: I've been there. They have death info. But not the 1900 census. Thanks tho :) Mary: Thank you very much. That is what I needed to know. That Sherman and Rachel are not mine. On the list I saw all that info wasn't listed. TammynAlabama: Thank you. That is my people. I provided some of that info. What I need is info on Rachel (Jones). Her parents, when and where she was born. Should you come across anything,… [cont.]
Asked by Dove - Mon Sep 21 02:08:38 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, I can locate only one couple of Sherman and Rachel Bishop and they weren't living in either North or South Carolina at the time of the 1900 census. Nor according to what they supplied to the census, were they born in either North or South Carolina. They were living at 149 Temple Street in Washington Court House City, Fayette County, Ohio. Both listed that they had been born in Ohio and that both of their parents had also been born in Ohio. In 1900 Sherman was 34 and Rachel 29. They listed their marriage as 1888. They had had 5 children, three of whom were still living. Ethel age 7, Ruth age 3 and Paul 2 months old at the time of the census. Sherman listed his profession as an Oil Dealer. I don't know if this is the same… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Mon Sep 21 07:38:17 2009
Q. 2nd post: If you have an account at Ancestry.com, would you look up the 1900 United States Federal Census for Sherman Bishop and spouse Rachel Bishop. I saw it listed there. But I couldn't get the info. At that time my Sherman and Rachel would have live either in South Carolina or North Carolina. Any help appreciated. oweniscummins: I've been there. They have death info. But not the 1900 census. Thanks tho :) Mary: Thank you very much. That is what I needed to know. That Sherman and Rachel are not mine. On the list I saw all that info wasn't listed. TammynAlabama: Thank you. That is my people. I provided some of that info. What I need is info on Rachel (Jones). Her parents, when and where she was born. Should you come across anything,… [cont.]
Asked by Dove - Mon Sep 21 02:08:38 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well, I can locate only one couple of Sherman and Rachel Bishop and they weren't living in either North or South Carolina at the time of the 1900 census. Nor according to what they supplied to the census, were they born in either North or South Carolina. They were living at 149 Temple Street in Washington Court House City, Fayette County, Ohio. Both listed that they had been born in Ohio and that both of their parents had also been born in Ohio. In 1900 Sherman was 34 and Rachel 29. They listed their marriage as 1888. They had had 5 children, three of whom were still living. Ethel age 7, Ruth age 3 and Paul 2 months old at the time of the census. Sherman listed his profession as an Oil Dealer. I don't know if this is the same… [cont.]
Answered by unknown - Mon Sep 21 07:38:17 2009
find census records for forsyth county north carolina 1900 where do i go?
Q. schedule no 1. population twelfth census of the united states
Asked by rhea - Tue Aug 22 11:39:28 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You can go to ancestry.com I have used it many times.
Answered by Fire Systems Chick - Tue Aug 22 12:54:42 2006
Q. schedule no 1. population twelfth census of the united states
Asked by rhea - Tue Aug 22 11:39:28 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You can go to ancestry.com I have used it many times.
Answered by Fire Systems Chick - Tue Aug 22 12:54:42 2006
statistics homework help?
Q. U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the average number of persons per household in the United States for census years between 1850 and 2000 are shown in the following table. Year Per House 1850 5.55 1860 5.28 1870 5.09 1880 5.04 1890 4.93 1900 4.76 1910 4.54 1920 4.34 1930 4.11 1940 3.67 1950 3.37 1960 3.35 1970 3.14 1980 2.76 1990 2.63 2000 2.59 (a) Determine the least squares line for these data. Use the equation of this line to estimate the number of persons per household in the year 2011. (b) What is the slope of the line? (c) Based on the regression line, what would be the predicted persons per household in the year 2300? (d) What is the lowest possible value of… [cont.]
Asked by Erin - Wed Feb 18 12:23:26 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. (a) The least squares regression line is y = 44.392 - 0.0209x where x is the year and the estimate for 2011 would be 2.36 persons. (b) The slope is therefore -0.0209 persons per year. That means the average occupancy is falling by about one person every 50 years. (c) For x = 2300, y = -3.7, which is clearly nonsense. (d) The minimum occupancy could be zero, if everyone was a vagrant and no one ever lived at an address; or 1.0 if everyone has to be listed as living somewhere ! The problem with this analysis arises from the assumption that the relationship is a straight line. Obviously it's not.
Answered by Victor - Wed Feb 18 12:41:44 2009
Q. U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the average number of persons per household in the United States for census years between 1850 and 2000 are shown in the following table. Year Per House 1850 5.55 1860 5.28 1870 5.09 1880 5.04 1890 4.93 1900 4.76 1910 4.54 1920 4.34 1930 4.11 1940 3.67 1950 3.37 1960 3.35 1970 3.14 1980 2.76 1990 2.63 2000 2.59 (a) Determine the least squares line for these data. Use the equation of this line to estimate the number of persons per household in the year 2011. (b) What is the slope of the line? (c) Based on the regression line, what would be the predicted persons per household in the year 2300? (d) What is the lowest possible value of… [cont.]
Asked by Erin - Wed Feb 18 12:23:26 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. (a) The least squares regression line is y = 44.392 - 0.0209x where x is the year and the estimate for 2011 would be 2.36 persons. (b) The slope is therefore -0.0209 persons per year. That means the average occupancy is falling by about one person every 50 years. (c) For x = 2300, y = -3.7, which is clearly nonsense. (d) The minimum occupancy could be zero, if everyone was a vagrant and no one ever lived at an address; or 1.0 if everyone has to be listed as living somewhere ! The problem with this analysis arises from the assumption that the relationship is a straight line. Obviously it's not.
Answered by Victor - Wed Feb 18 12:41:44 2009
math word problem.....predicting the population?
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 1900 76 1910 92 1920 106 1930 123 1940 131 1950 150 1960 179 1970 203 1980 227 1990 250 2000 275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ___ million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1960 and 1970 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ___ million
Asked by SPORT - Wed Oct 21 11:05:50 2009 - - 0 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 1900 76 1910 92 1920 106 1930 123 1940 131 1950 150 1960 179 1970 203 1980 227 1990 250 2000 275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ___ million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1960 and 1970 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ___ million
Asked by SPORT - Wed Oct 21 11:05:50 2009 - - 0 Answers - 0 Comments
another Exponential growth and decay question. Please help me!!?
Q. I don't really know what to do with this. I tried doing the slope of the 2 years given but I don't think that's right. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million
Asked by d_kuon - Thu Nov 6 22:30:37 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a) P(1910) = 76 e^10k = 92 k = ln (92/76)/10 So P(2000) = 76 e^100 ln (92/76)/10 = 513.5 b) P(1990) = 227 e^10k = 250 k = ln (250/227)/10 So P(2000) = 227 e^20 ln (250/227)/10 = 275.3
Answered by DANIEL G - Thu Nov 6 23:09:53 2008
Q. I don't really know what to do with this. I tried doing the slope of the 2 years given but I don't think that's right. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million
Asked by d_kuon - Thu Nov 6 22:30:37 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a) P(1910) = 76 e^10k = 92 k = ln (92/76)/10 So P(2000) = 76 e^100 ln (92/76)/10 = 513.5 b) P(1990) = 227 e^10k = 250 k = ln (250/227)/10 So P(2000) = 227 e^20 ln (250/227)/10 = 275.3
Answered by DANIEL G - Thu Nov 6 23:09:53 2008
Abortion.. What are your views?
Q. Trapped... Time Has Run Out For Over 49 Million Americans. By Another's Choice.. Who is trapped by the "choice" of abortion? Both the mother and the pre-born child. Abortion is legal through all nine months of pregnancy in the United States. The infamous Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion throughout the United States. The lesser-known companion case, Doe v. Bolton, defined the "health" exception. This case solidified Roe in allowing abortion through all nine months if the pregnancy threatens the life or health of the mother. The vague word used here is "health." What does "health" mean to you? Doe v. Bolton defined health to include, "physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age - relevant to the wellbeing of… [cont.]
Asked by .Tiffany. - Sun Jun 8 21:27:41 2008 - - 15 Answers - 3 Comments
A. Well, I couldn't resist answering, but I didn't have time to read your book. Basically, I assume you are saying you are pro life. That's good. It disgusts me when I hear people say that "it's my body and I have a right to do what I want to it." Well, you're right! Do whatever you want to your body - tattoos, multiple piercings, unprotected sex, suicide, etc - nobody cares. But you have absolutely no right to kill another human who happens to be living inside your body. That's murder. Let's say I'm walking down the street and someone decides to hitch a ride on my back. That doesn't give me the right to kill the person. The baby is not 'yours'. You are simply a vehicle for bringing a person into the world. If we are to allow killing of… [cont.]
Answered by theshadowknows - Sun Jun 8 21:48:27 2008
Q. Trapped... Time Has Run Out For Over 49 Million Americans. By Another's Choice.. Who is trapped by the "choice" of abortion? Both the mother and the pre-born child. Abortion is legal through all nine months of pregnancy in the United States. The infamous Roe v. Wade case legalized abortion throughout the United States. The lesser-known companion case, Doe v. Bolton, defined the "health" exception. This case solidified Roe in allowing abortion through all nine months if the pregnancy threatens the life or health of the mother. The vague word used here is "health." What does "health" mean to you? Doe v. Bolton defined health to include, "physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age - relevant to the wellbeing of… [cont.]
Asked by .Tiffany. - Sun Jun 8 21:27:41 2008 - - 15 Answers - 3 Comments
A. Well, I couldn't resist answering, but I didn't have time to read your book. Basically, I assume you are saying you are pro life. That's good. It disgusts me when I hear people say that "it's my body and I have a right to do what I want to it." Well, you're right! Do whatever you want to your body - tattoos, multiple piercings, unprotected sex, suicide, etc - nobody cares. But you have absolutely no right to kill another human who happens to be living inside your body. That's murder. Let's say I'm walking down the street and someone decides to hitch a ride on my back. That doesn't give me the right to kill the person. The baby is not 'yours'. You are simply a vehicle for bringing a person into the world. If we are to allow killing of… [cont.]
Answered by theshadowknows - Sun Jun 8 21:48:27 2008
From Yahoo Answer Search: '1900 United States Census'
Sun Oct 25 11:31:10 2009 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
news.google.com
Washington Post
As a child of the 50's... never could I have imagined that the topic of "killing" the President of the United States , would one day be placed for public ...
Secret Service Probing Facebook Poll on Obama Washington Post
all 837 news articles »
schwertfamily.net
2132px x 2214px | 249.90kB
[source page]
already residing in Buffalo New York The family s original surname was shortened to Schwert upon their emigration to the United States and Maria became Mary According to the 1900 U S Census John Martin Patz Johann Martin Patzke was born in November 1865 Other family records suggest that he was born on November 11 1863 that he was born in Danzig and
[Hide]▲
