Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000.?
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 P(2000) =
Asked by julie - Mon Mar 15 20:14:08 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The model is y = Ae^(Bx) where y is population, in millions, and x is the year minus 1900. We need to scale x to keep the x values reasonable. The two equations are 76 = Ae^(0B) 92 = Ae^(10B) The first equation tells us that A = 76 since e^0 = 1. Plug into the second equation, 92 = 76e^(10B) e^(10B) = 92/76 Take the ln of both sides, 10B = ln(92/76) = 0.191055237 So B = 0.019105524 and the equation is y = 76e^(0.019105524x) In 2000, x = 100, so y = 76e^[(0.019105524)(100)] = 76e^(1.910552368) y = 513.5183213 <-- population in 2000 The observed population is 275, so the model is overestimating.
Answered by Robert - Mon Mar 15 20:30:34 2010
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 P(2000) =
Asked by julie - Mon Mar 15 20:14:08 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. The model is y = Ae^(Bx) where y is population, in millions, and x is the year minus 1900. We need to scale x to keep the x values reasonable. The two equations are 76 = Ae^(0B) 92 = Ae^(10B) The first equation tells us that A = 76 since e^0 = 1. Plug into the second equation, 92 = 76e^(10B) e^(10B) = 92/76 Take the ln of both sides, 10B = ln(92/76) = 0.191055237 So B = 0.019105524 and the equation is y = 76e^(0.019105524x) In 2000, x = 100, so y = 76e^[(0.019105524)(100)] = 76e^(1.910552368) y = 513.5183213 <-- population in 2000 The observed population is 275, so the model is overestimating.
Answered by Robert - Mon Mar 15 20:30:34 2010
could somebody please look up these 4 records on ancestry.com?
Q. New York Passenger Lists, 1820-1957 Record Immigration & Emigration * Name: Pietro Above Birth: year in location Arrival: dd mm year in location Departure: location 1900 United States Federal Census Record Census & Voter Lists * Name: Pietro Above Head of house: name surname Birth: date in location Residence: year in city, New York, New York, Arrival: year or ignore hint * Boston Passenger Lists, 1820-1943 Record Immigration & Emigration * Name: Pietro Above Other relation: name surname Birth: year Origin: location Arrival: dd mm year in location Departure: location * New York Passenger… [cont.]
Asked by Me - Tue Nov 3 09:28:32 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I tried, but there were zero results for that name in those databases. Sorry! :(
Answered by Bwilkerson - Tue Nov 3 16:46:55 2009
Q. New York Passenger Lists, 1820-1957 Record Immigration & Emigration * Name: Pietro Above Birth: year in location Arrival: dd mm year in location Departure: location 1900 United States Federal Census Record Census & Voter Lists * Name: Pietro Above Head of house: name surname Birth: date in location Residence: year in city, New York, New York, Arrival: year or ignore hint * Boston Passenger Lists, 1820-1943 Record Immigration & Emigration * Name: Pietro Above Other relation: name surname Birth: year Origin: location Arrival: dd mm year in location Departure: location * New York Passenger… [cont.]
Asked by Me - Tue Nov 3 09:28:32 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I tried, but there were zero results for that name in those databases. Sorry! :(
Answered by Bwilkerson - Tue Nov 3 16:46:55 2009
find census records for forsyth county north carolina 1900 where do i go?
Q. schedule no 1. population twelfth census of the united states
Asked by rhea - Tue Aug 22 11:39:28 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You can go to ancestry.com I have used it many times.
Answered by Fire Systems Chick - Tue Aug 22 12:54:42 2006
Q. schedule no 1. population twelfth census of the united states
Asked by rhea - Tue Aug 22 11:39:28 2006 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You can go to ancestry.com I have used it many times.
Answered by Fire Systems Chick - Tue Aug 22 12:54:42 2006
Possible clue found on great-grandfather: How can I gather more information on this possible person?
Q. Do you think this could be my great-grandfather? My grandfather Thomas Madigan was born on February 24, 1919 in Brooklyn, NY. He was the tenth of ten children, so it's possible his father could have been 39 years old when having him. His wife (my grandmother) was also born in 1919 in Brooklyn, NY. She was the seventh of seven children, as her father was was born in 1880. On this link, it says John Madigan (the name of my great-grandfather), was born in May 1880, so it's in the same time frame. The key though is that it says in the 1900 U.S. Census that he was residing in Brooklyn (Kings). This would have been two years after Brooklyn was consolidated into New York City. I know for certain that my grandfather's parents were born in the… [cont.]
Asked by Tom - Fri Mar 13 23:12:19 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. was wondering how you were coming along, Tom... I pulled up the John Madigan in 1900, born May 1880. This John is single, and living with his widowed father. No wife. If John and Margaret were married in 1898, this contradicts it. An 1898 marriage to Margaret is just about right. Meaning, they were married 21 yrs in 1919.. and like many persons in that day.. the standard is a child every other year. By the way.. I love that site. Experience helps to read the stuff. Look at the top, and you can save it as a jpeg to your computer. Also.. look to the side of the "save file" thingie, and there is a slider bar which allows you to zoom on the image. The drawback is not having 1910, 1920, 1930 so you can check all three. You also are hitting a… [cont.]
Answered by wendy c - Fri Mar 13 23:51:24 2009
Q. Do you think this could be my great-grandfather? My grandfather Thomas Madigan was born on February 24, 1919 in Brooklyn, NY. He was the tenth of ten children, so it's possible his father could have been 39 years old when having him. His wife (my grandmother) was also born in 1919 in Brooklyn, NY. She was the seventh of seven children, as her father was was born in 1880. On this link, it says John Madigan (the name of my great-grandfather), was born in May 1880, so it's in the same time frame. The key though is that it says in the 1900 U.S. Census that he was residing in Brooklyn (Kings). This would have been two years after Brooklyn was consolidated into New York City. I know for certain that my grandfather's parents were born in the… [cont.]
Asked by Tom - Fri Mar 13 23:12:19 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. was wondering how you were coming along, Tom... I pulled up the John Madigan in 1900, born May 1880. This John is single, and living with his widowed father. No wife. If John and Margaret were married in 1898, this contradicts it. An 1898 marriage to Margaret is just about right. Meaning, they were married 21 yrs in 1919.. and like many persons in that day.. the standard is a child every other year. By the way.. I love that site. Experience helps to read the stuff. Look at the top, and you can save it as a jpeg to your computer. Also.. look to the side of the "save file" thingie, and there is a slider bar which allows you to zoom on the image. The drawback is not having 1910, 1920, 1930 so you can check all three. You also are hitting a… [cont.]
Answered by wendy c - Fri Mar 13 23:51:24 2009
What are your thoughts on 2nd generation 30 years of immigration have made our country more unequal, poorer?
Q. Millions of children of Latino immigrants are confronting the same challenge as they come of age in one of the most difficult economic climates in decades. Whether they succeed will have consequences far beyond immigrant circles. As a result of the arrival of more than 20 million mostly Mexican and Central American newcomers in a wave that swelled in the 1970s and soared during the 1990s, the offspring of Latino immigrants now account for one of every 10 children, both in the United States and the Washington region. Largely because of the growth of this second generation, Latino immigrants and their U.S.-born children and grandchildren will represent almost a third of the nation's working-age adults by mid-century, according to… [cont.]
Asked by ANNIE - Wed Dec 9 14:13:38 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. if we have to rely on second generation Latinos this country is doomed. gang bangers and dropouts wow what a culture no wasted tax money on this group. there will be no amnesty,no dream act , immigration laws already voted on and passed will be aggressively enforced. this article is a prime example of a culture that will not adapt and continues to dumb down our society. remove this infestation and we as a nation will have a more intellegent population and a much robust financially sound enviorment.
Answered by bobby - Wed Dec 9 14:21:53 2009
Q. Millions of children of Latino immigrants are confronting the same challenge as they come of age in one of the most difficult economic climates in decades. Whether they succeed will have consequences far beyond immigrant circles. As a result of the arrival of more than 20 million mostly Mexican and Central American newcomers in a wave that swelled in the 1970s and soared during the 1990s, the offspring of Latino immigrants now account for one of every 10 children, both in the United States and the Washington region. Largely because of the growth of this second generation, Latino immigrants and their U.S.-born children and grandchildren will represent almost a third of the nation's working-age adults by mid-century, according to… [cont.]
Asked by ANNIE - Wed Dec 9 14:13:38 2009 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. if we have to rely on second generation Latinos this country is doomed. gang bangers and dropouts wow what a culture no wasted tax money on this group. there will be no amnesty,no dream act , immigration laws already voted on and passed will be aggressively enforced. this article is a prime example of a culture that will not adapt and continues to dumb down our society. remove this infestation and we as a nation will have a more intellegent population and a much robust financially sound enviorment.
Answered by bobby - Wed Dec 9 14:21:53 2009
Is this and A paper????
Q. im writing a report on Nevada and need to know if this is good. It will say look here for pics but there on a cologe so these are just words... nevada the state of Nevada was claimed as the 36th state on October 31, 1864.Thats when it became an official state. Nevada s nicknames are Sagebrush State, Battle Born State, and the most known nickname is the Silver State. The meaning of the name of our state Nevada is snow-capped in Spanish. Here are some facts about Nevada; the population is about 1,998,257 people. It s the 35th largest state (2000 census). Nevada s Capital is Carson City. The state bird is the Mountain Bluebird and the state animal is the Desert Bighorn. The state flower is Sagebrush and the state tree is… [cont.]
Asked by ***Zarriah Rose*** - Fri Mar 28 12:47:29 2008 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I can't read it all, but from what I skimmed it seems like you're just bulleting. Try listing in more creative ways.
Answered by unknown - Fri Mar 28 12:50:04 2008
Q. im writing a report on Nevada and need to know if this is good. It will say look here for pics but there on a cologe so these are just words... nevada the state of Nevada was claimed as the 36th state on October 31, 1864.Thats when it became an official state. Nevada s nicknames are Sagebrush State, Battle Born State, and the most known nickname is the Silver State. The meaning of the name of our state Nevada is snow-capped in Spanish. Here are some facts about Nevada; the population is about 1,998,257 people. It s the 35th largest state (2000 census). Nevada s Capital is Carson City. The state bird is the Mountain Bluebird and the state animal is the Desert Bighorn. The state flower is Sagebrush and the state tree is… [cont.]
Asked by ***Zarriah Rose*** - Fri Mar 28 12:47:29 2008 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments
A. I can't read it all, but from what I skimmed it seems like you're just bulleting. Try listing in more creative ways.
Answered by unknown - Fri Mar 28 12:50:04 2008
another Exponential growth and decay question. Please help me!!?
Q. I don't really know what to do with this. I tried doing the slope of the 2 years given but I don't think that's right. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million
Asked by d_kuon - Thu Nov 6 22:30:37 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a) P(1910) = 76 e^10k = 92 k = ln (92/76)/10 So P(2000) = 76 e^100 ln (92/76)/10 = 513.5 b) P(1990) = 227 e^10k = 250 k = ln (250/227)/10 So P(2000) = 227 e^20 ln (250/227)/10 = 275.3
Answered by DANIEL G - Thu Nov 6 23:09:53 2008
Q. I don't really know what to do with this. I tried doing the slope of the 2 years given but I don't think that's right. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million
Asked by d_kuon - Thu Nov 6 22:30:37 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a) P(1910) = 76 e^10k = 92 k = ln (92/76)/10 So P(2000) = 76 e^100 ln (92/76)/10 = 513.5 b) P(1990) = 227 e^10k = 250 k = ln (250/227)/10 So P(2000) = 227 e^20 ln (250/227)/10 = 275.3
Answered by DANIEL G - Thu Nov 6 23:09:53 2008
how to predict population in 2000?
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. Year Population 1900 76 1910 92 1920 106 1930 123 1940 131 1950 150 1960 179 1970 203 1980 227 1990 250 2000 275 Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1950 and 1960 to predict the population in 2000.
Asked by Mindy - Tue Mar 2 02:16:05 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. Year Population 1900 76 1910 92 1920 106 1930 123 1940 131 1950 150 1960 179 1970 203 1980 227 1990 250 2000 275 Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1950 and 1960 to predict the population in 2000.
Asked by Mindy - Tue Mar 2 02:16:05 2010 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
From Yahoo Answer Search: '1900 United States Census'
Wed Sep 8 18:48:32 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
cdispatch.com
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:41:19 GMT+00:00
The Commercial Dispatch A redistricting plan requires approval of the United States Department of Justice; if a plan reflects an effort to favor one political party over another, ...
historyplace.com
396px x 565px | 78.40kB
[source page]
In 1900 approximately two million children were working in mills mines fields factories stores and on city streets across the United States The 1900 census which counted
[Hide]▲
