Can someone help with another brick wall?
Q. Looking for the parents of: Louis Green Shields? Louis Green Shields Born: Jul 25 1872 Georgia Died: Oct 25 1942 Yuba City, California I have the following Documentation: 1910 United States Federal Census 1930 United States Federal Census California Death Index, 1940-1997 His wife's name was: Martha Jane Raby Born: 24 Jun 1878 Bigflat, Marion, Arkansas, USA Died: 22 Feb 1945 , , California, USA There Children James Albert Andrew Jackson Shields 1897 1937 Elick Arthur C Shields 1899 1975 Bertha E Shields 1901 1967 Earl Vester Shields 1905 1993 Ernest Edward Shields 1908 1994 Calvin Jewel Shields 1911 1974 Lara Alice Shields 1913 1998 Garland L Shields 1917 1940 Ruby May Shields 1920 1998 THANKS!!! Violet I think you have… [cont.]
Asked by DrMichael - Tue Mar 18 00:07:19 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This is a long shot...but maybe his name was spelled wrong on the census. I found this one that could be a possibility if the name was spelled wrong, but you did not include who any of his siblings may be, so I cannot rule this possibility out. Here in 1880 there is a Lavaries G. Shields, age 9. Right age. When I looked at the original, Lavaries could have been some spelling of Louis or Lewis that ancestry transcribed wrong.
Answered by Adelle - Tue Mar 18 00:38:02 2008
Q. Looking for the parents of: Louis Green Shields? Louis Green Shields Born: Jul 25 1872 Georgia Died: Oct 25 1942 Yuba City, California I have the following Documentation: 1910 United States Federal Census 1930 United States Federal Census California Death Index, 1940-1997 His wife's name was: Martha Jane Raby Born: 24 Jun 1878 Bigflat, Marion, Arkansas, USA Died: 22 Feb 1945 , , California, USA There Children James Albert Andrew Jackson Shields 1897 1937 Elick Arthur C Shields 1899 1975 Bertha E Shields 1901 1967 Earl Vester Shields 1905 1993 Ernest Edward Shields 1908 1994 Calvin Jewel Shields 1911 1974 Lara Alice Shields 1913 1998 Garland L Shields 1917 1940 Ruby May Shields 1920 1998 THANKS!!! Violet I think you have… [cont.]
Asked by DrMichael - Tue Mar 18 00:07:19 2008 - - 3 Answers - 0 Comments
A. This is a long shot...but maybe his name was spelled wrong on the census. I found this one that could be a possibility if the name was spelled wrong, but you did not include who any of his siblings may be, so I cannot rule this possibility out. Here in 1880 there is a Lavaries G. Shields, age 9. Right age. When I looked at the original, Lavaries could have been some spelling of Louis or Lewis that ancestry transcribed wrong.
Answered by Adelle - Tue Mar 18 00:38:02 2008
Have you ever wished you could go back in time and kick the census people?
Q. Hey, I get bored easily so so me. I'd always have people ask the question about tracing the linage and I'd hear the same old stuff. If you aren't on a list and if you didn't keep up with a tribal affiliation then you can't be Native American. I have a lot of friends that are black and Native mixed but the Native part was lost to them through no fault of their own. It seems that the census and some very unscrupulous practices were going on around 1930. Now that this is know what can people that want to trace their Native heritage do if they are not White to trace their Native heritage? My source
Asked by Midnight - Mon May 24 19:24:28 2010 - - 3 Answers - 2 Comments
A. lol that is an excellent point! i am guessing but it may have to do with the advantages natives get in north america in laws such as not paying taxes and such.perhaps they do not wish just anyone to be able to get those entitlements so if you do not keep record it is lost
Answered by sean - Mon May 24 19:28:17 2010
Q. Hey, I get bored easily so so me. I'd always have people ask the question about tracing the linage and I'd hear the same old stuff. If you aren't on a list and if you didn't keep up with a tribal affiliation then you can't be Native American. I have a lot of friends that are black and Native mixed but the Native part was lost to them through no fault of their own. It seems that the census and some very unscrupulous practices were going on around 1930. Now that this is know what can people that want to trace their Native heritage do if they are not White to trace their Native heritage? My source
Asked by Midnight - Mon May 24 19:24:28 2010 - - 3 Answers - 2 Comments
A. lol that is an excellent point! i am guessing but it may have to do with the advantages natives get in north america in laws such as not paying taxes and such.perhaps they do not wish just anyone to be able to get those entitlements so if you do not keep record it is lost
Answered by sean - Mon May 24 19:28:17 2010
statistics homework help?
Q. U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the average number of persons per household in the United States for census years between 1850 and 2000 are shown in the following table. Year Per House 1850 5.55 1860 5.28 1870 5.09 1880 5.04 1890 4.93 1900 4.76 1910 4.54 1920 4.34 1930 4.11 1940 3.67 1950 3.37 1960 3.35 1970 3.14 1980 2.76 1990 2.63 2000 2.59 (a) Determine the least squares line for these data. Use the equation of this line to estimate the number of persons per household in the year 2011. (b) What is the slope of the line? (c) Based on the regression line, what would be the predicted persons per household in the year 2300? (d) What is the lowest possible value of… [cont.]
Asked by Erin - Wed Feb 18 12:23:26 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. (a) The least squares regression line is y = 44.392 - 0.0209x where x is the year and the estimate for 2011 would be 2.36 persons. (b) The slope is therefore -0.0209 persons per year. That means the average occupancy is falling by about one person every 50 years. (c) For x = 2300, y = -3.7, which is clearly nonsense. (d) The minimum occupancy could be zero, if everyone was a vagrant and no one ever lived at an address; or 1.0 if everyone has to be listed as living somewhere ! The problem with this analysis arises from the assumption that the relationship is a straight line. Obviously it's not.
Answered by Victor - Wed Feb 18 12:41:44 2009
Q. U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the average number of persons per household in the United States for census years between 1850 and 2000 are shown in the following table. Year Per House 1850 5.55 1860 5.28 1870 5.09 1880 5.04 1890 4.93 1900 4.76 1910 4.54 1920 4.34 1930 4.11 1940 3.67 1950 3.37 1960 3.35 1970 3.14 1980 2.76 1990 2.63 2000 2.59 (a) Determine the least squares line for these data. Use the equation of this line to estimate the number of persons per household in the year 2011. (b) What is the slope of the line? (c) Based on the regression line, what would be the predicted persons per household in the year 2300? (d) What is the lowest possible value of… [cont.]
Asked by Erin - Wed Feb 18 12:23:26 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. (a) The least squares regression line is y = 44.392 - 0.0209x where x is the year and the estimate for 2011 would be 2.36 persons. (b) The slope is therefore -0.0209 persons per year. That means the average occupancy is falling by about one person every 50 years. (c) For x = 2300, y = -3.7, which is clearly nonsense. (d) The minimum occupancy could be zero, if everyone was a vagrant and no one ever lived at an address; or 1.0 if everyone has to be listed as living somewhere ! The problem with this analysis arises from the assumption that the relationship is a straight line. Obviously it's not.
Answered by Victor - Wed Feb 18 12:41:44 2009
Is there a way I could research an murder or deportation in Italy in the early-1920's?
Q. I was talking with my grandmother today and she told me that her father (Rocco Lozito) came to the U.S. because he murdered someone. She said he was in between the ages of 14-16 when this happened. I don't know all the details to why he wasn't prosecuted, but I'm taking it's possible they couldn't have prosecuted him as an adult since he was a minor. So he was given the option of deportation. Suppodely, everyone in his village (in the Bari province - it may have been Torrito) had to raise enough money for him to be able to move to Mexico. So they did and he moved to Mexico, and not too much later, moved to the U.S. I don't know if he initially moved to Brooklyn, in New York City, but that's where he'd eventually live most of his life. She… [cont.]
Asked by Tom - Thu Mar 19 22:04:55 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Rocco lozito 23 Feb 190411 Feb 1992 (V)10305 (Staten Island, Richmond, NY)(none specified)109-30-1007New York Tom, above is ssdi (free at rootsweb). The key here is the date he gave; and he has a social security file out there. And possibly a naturalization file. Your comment on deportation is very iffy.. deporting someone is normally forcing a person to leave, who is not legal in that place. Being born in Italy.. he would have been prosecuted there, not kicked out. If a murder occurred, my bet is that he never was charged, and ran. I don't think American standards of prosecution as adult or minor are going to be applicable. What census data do you have, and (again, buddy of mine.. you need to be seeing the full copy). Is there some way… [cont.]
Answered by wendy c - Fri Mar 20 03:45:08 2009
Q. I was talking with my grandmother today and she told me that her father (Rocco Lozito) came to the U.S. because he murdered someone. She said he was in between the ages of 14-16 when this happened. I don't know all the details to why he wasn't prosecuted, but I'm taking it's possible they couldn't have prosecuted him as an adult since he was a minor. So he was given the option of deportation. Suppodely, everyone in his village (in the Bari province - it may have been Torrito) had to raise enough money for him to be able to move to Mexico. So they did and he moved to Mexico, and not too much later, moved to the U.S. I don't know if he initially moved to Brooklyn, in New York City, but that's where he'd eventually live most of his life. She… [cont.]
Asked by Tom - Thu Mar 19 22:04:55 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Rocco lozito 23 Feb 190411 Feb 1992 (V)10305 (Staten Island, Richmond, NY)(none specified)109-30-1007New York Tom, above is ssdi (free at rootsweb). The key here is the date he gave; and he has a social security file out there. And possibly a naturalization file. Your comment on deportation is very iffy.. deporting someone is normally forcing a person to leave, who is not legal in that place. Being born in Italy.. he would have been prosecuted there, not kicked out. If a murder occurred, my bet is that he never was charged, and ran. I don't think American standards of prosecution as adult or minor are going to be applicable. What census data do you have, and (again, buddy of mine.. you need to be seeing the full copy). Is there some way… [cont.]
Answered by wendy c - Fri Mar 20 03:45:08 2009
Those of you who are generation Y, are you aware that the term "Asian" wasn't invented till the 1980s?
Q. Generation Y YA users, how much do YOU know about the history of "Asians"? But you don't know about it much. If you are interested, read below and share your thoughts. "The 1960 census racial categories included American Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Japanese, Negro, part Hawaiian, White, Eskimo and Aleut" "The 1970 census racial categories included: Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Indian American, Japanese, Negro or Black, other, White, Hispanic origin of any race, and White, not of Hispanic origin. Mexicans were counted as white from 1930 until 1970, when they re-entered the census as Hispanic origin. It was a deliberate effort to count Hispanics without treating them as a race. They were to be considered a cultural/linguistic… [cont.]
Asked by Yong - Peng Suen - Thu Feb 5 14:37:29 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Can You Get a Grip...Lmao.
Answered by x_ od_x - Thu Feb 5 14:40:28 2009
Q. Generation Y YA users, how much do YOU know about the history of "Asians"? But you don't know about it much. If you are interested, read below and share your thoughts. "The 1960 census racial categories included American Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Japanese, Negro, part Hawaiian, White, Eskimo and Aleut" "The 1970 census racial categories included: Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Indian American, Japanese, Negro or Black, other, White, Hispanic origin of any race, and White, not of Hispanic origin. Mexicans were counted as white from 1930 until 1970, when they re-entered the census as Hispanic origin. It was a deliberate effort to count Hispanics without treating them as a race. They were to be considered a cultural/linguistic… [cont.]
Asked by Yong - Peng Suen - Thu Feb 5 14:37:29 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Can You Get a Grip...Lmao.
Answered by x_ od_x - Thu Feb 5 14:40:28 2009
Math test help!!!! 50 point question!!!?
Q. The table gives the population of the united states, in millions for the years 1900-1990? YEAR - Population 1900 - 76 1910 - 92 1920 - 106 1930 -123 1940 -131 1950- 150 1960 - 179 1970- 203 1980 - 227 1990 - 250 A. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to find equation, use that to predict the population for 1990. Compare with the actual figure and try to explain the discrepancy. B. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1970 and 1980 to find an equation, use that to predict the population for 1990.Compare with the actual population. Use this model to predict the population in the years 2000 and 2010.
Asked by Dani - Sun Apr 6 15:34:48 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A. The increase of population from1900 to 1910 was 16 mil which is 21.05% increase. Using that as the percentage in the formula, and 76 as the initial population, the equation is: 76 e^.2105t where t is the number of decades past 1900. The discrepency could be a larger percentage increase between 1900 and 1910 than other decades. B. Using 1970 and 1980 gives a different percentage of increase at 11.82%. The equation now changes to: 203 e^.1182t with t = # of decades so the population prediction is 289.4 mil in 2000 and 325.7 mil. in 2010
Answered by Rusty - Sun Apr 6 20:09:12 2008
Q. The table gives the population of the united states, in millions for the years 1900-1990? YEAR - Population 1900 - 76 1910 - 92 1920 - 106 1930 -123 1940 -131 1950- 150 1960 - 179 1970- 203 1980 - 227 1990 - 250 A. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to find equation, use that to predict the population for 1990. Compare with the actual figure and try to explain the discrepancy. B. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1970 and 1980 to find an equation, use that to predict the population for 1990.Compare with the actual population. Use this model to predict the population in the years 2000 and 2010.
Asked by Dani - Sun Apr 6 15:34:48 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A. The increase of population from1900 to 1910 was 16 mil which is 21.05% increase. Using that as the percentage in the formula, and 76 as the initial population, the equation is: 76 e^.2105t where t is the number of decades past 1900. The discrepency could be a larger percentage increase between 1900 and 1910 than other decades. B. Using 1970 and 1980 gives a different percentage of increase at 11.82%. The equation now changes to: 203 e^.1182t with t = # of decades so the population prediction is 289.4 mil in 2000 and 325.7 mil. in 2010
Answered by Rusty - Sun Apr 6 20:09:12 2008
exponential models...help please 10 points?
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. Year Population 1900 76 1910 92 1920 106 1930 123 1940 131 1950 150 1960 179 1970 203 1980 227 1990 250 2000 275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ? million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1960 and 1970 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ? million i have no idea how to do this please help
Asked by Ashleigh G - Fri Apr 24 16:00:26 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a.) 513 million b.) 296 million
Answered by bob - Fri Apr 24 16:06:52 2009
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. Year Population 1900 76 1910 92 1920 106 1930 123 1940 131 1950 150 1960 179 1970 203 1980 227 1990 250 2000 275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ? million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1960 and 1970 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = ? million i have no idea how to do this please help
Asked by Ashleigh G - Fri Apr 24 16:00:26 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a.) 513 million b.) 296 million
Answered by bob - Fri Apr 24 16:06:52 2009
Help On Finding Out When My Great-Great-Grandfather died?
Q. I have a lot of information on him. I've put some of it together, but haven't put all of it together yet. So, here's what I know. His name is John Clark. His son, my maternal great-grandfather, is James Clark. I know his son was born in November 1880. I'm not sure what year John Clark was born in, but I know it was in the United States. I'm figuring he was probably born in the neighborhood of 1850. However, I don't know if he was born in New York, but it may be since his son was born there and he died there. I also know he was of Irish descent and Catholic, but not sure if his parents were from Ireland. I'm guessing it's possible though, since most Irish Catholic immigrants came around the Potato Famine. I know there's some interesting… [cont.]
Asked by Tom - Sat May 23 00:04:09 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. James clarke birth Date: 2 Nov 1880 Death Date: Dec 1966 State or Territory Where Number Was Issued: New York Death Residence Localities zip code: 10468 Localities: Bronx, Bronx, New York Jerome Avenue, Bronx, New York Social Security Death Index *** Name Relation Marital Status Gender Race Age Birthplace Occupation Father's Birthplace Mother's Birthplace John clarke self M Male W 30 NY Oysterman ny ny annie clarke wife M Female W 24 NY Keeps House ny ny edward clarke son S Male W 2 ny ny ny source Information: Census Place 13th Ward, District 4, New York, New York 1880 (Manhattan), New York City-Greater, New York *** ny new york … [cont.]
Answered by Sidney - Sat May 23 18:37:00 2009
Q. I have a lot of information on him. I've put some of it together, but haven't put all of it together yet. So, here's what I know. His name is John Clark. His son, my maternal great-grandfather, is James Clark. I know his son was born in November 1880. I'm not sure what year John Clark was born in, but I know it was in the United States. I'm figuring he was probably born in the neighborhood of 1850. However, I don't know if he was born in New York, but it may be since his son was born there and he died there. I also know he was of Irish descent and Catholic, but not sure if his parents were from Ireland. I'm guessing it's possible though, since most Irish Catholic immigrants came around the Potato Famine. I know there's some interesting… [cont.]
Asked by Tom - Sat May 23 00:04:09 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. James clarke birth Date: 2 Nov 1880 Death Date: Dec 1966 State or Territory Where Number Was Issued: New York Death Residence Localities zip code: 10468 Localities: Bronx, Bronx, New York Jerome Avenue, Bronx, New York Social Security Death Index *** Name Relation Marital Status Gender Race Age Birthplace Occupation Father's Birthplace Mother's Birthplace John clarke self M Male W 30 NY Oysterman ny ny annie clarke wife M Female W 24 NY Keeps House ny ny edward clarke son S Male W 2 ny ny ny source Information: Census Place 13th Ward, District 4, New York, New York 1880 (Manhattan), New York City-Greater, New York *** ny new york … [cont.]
Answered by Sidney - Sat May 23 18:37:00 2009
From Yahoo Answer Search: '1930 United States Census'
Wed Sep 8 19:17:19 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
riverdalepress.com
Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:31:02 GMT+00:00
The Riverdale Press They make up most of the work force, make most of the money, run nearly every corporation in the United States large or small and through their ...
freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com
687px x 1044px | 159.40kB
[source page]
Wiliford Marie w f Oct 1839 0 Children ga nc ga 1910 United States Federal Census > Texas > Tyler > 2 j pct > District 160 lits George Jennie Addie Gussie Steve Robert and Algie 1920 Census Texas Tyler County Vol 151 ED 202 sheet 8 Line44 1930 Census Texas Tyler County Precinct 2 page 2
catalog.library.ucla.edu
unknown
hu, 31 Jul 2008 07:00:00 GM
Farms - . United States. . Manufactures - . United States. - Statistics. . United States. - . Census. , 15th, . 1930. . . United States. - Population - Statistics. Location: YRL Reference Reading Room: HA201 . 1930. .A5 2006.
[Hide]▲
