Those of you who are generation Y, are you aware that the term "Asian" wasn't invented till the 1980s?
Q. Generation Y YA users, how much do YOU know about the history of "Asians"? But you don't know about it much. If you are interested, read below and share your thoughts. "The 1960 census racial categories included American Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Japanese, Negro, part Hawaiian, White, Eskimo and Aleut" "The 1970 census racial categories included: Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Indian American, Japanese, Negro or Black, other, White, Hispanic origin of any race, and White, not of Hispanic origin. Mexicans were counted as white from 1930 until 1970, when they re-entered the census as Hispanic origin. It was a deliberate effort to count Hispanics without treating them as a race. They were to be considered a cultural/linguistic… [cont.]
Asked by Yong - Peng Suen - Thu Feb 5 14:37:29 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Can You Get a Grip...Lmao.
Answered by x_ od_x - Thu Feb 5 14:40:28 2009
Q. Generation Y YA users, how much do YOU know about the history of "Asians"? But you don't know about it much. If you are interested, read below and share your thoughts. "The 1960 census racial categories included American Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Japanese, Negro, part Hawaiian, White, Eskimo and Aleut" "The 1970 census racial categories included: Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Indian American, Japanese, Negro or Black, other, White, Hispanic origin of any race, and White, not of Hispanic origin. Mexicans were counted as white from 1930 until 1970, when they re-entered the census as Hispanic origin. It was a deliberate effort to count Hispanics without treating them as a race. They were to be considered a cultural/linguistic… [cont.]
Asked by Yong - Peng Suen - Thu Feb 5 14:37:29 2009 - - 10 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Can You Get a Grip...Lmao.
Answered by x_ od_x - Thu Feb 5 14:40:28 2009
Abortion!!! Is it wise to be pro life?
Q. Lets look at birth rates before and after Roe v Wade. In 1960 the number of births in the United States was 4.258 million. The number dropped to 3.137 million by 1973 when the courts finally told the pro lifers they could no longer violate our right to abortion. After Roe v Wade the birth rate climbed to 4.022 million births. Therefore when pro lifers "claim" that abortion is killing kids, it is simply untrue. The facts show that prior to Roe, the number of births was declining and after Roe the births are increasing. The facts are exactly opposite of what the pro lifers say. Abortion, because it leads to planned births and wanted kids increases the number of live birth, whereas adopting the pro life stance causes lower birth rates and… [cont.]
Asked by Give me Liberty - Tue Jan 27 23:50:50 2009 - - 23 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Here's a news flash - Perhaps you have heard that in order for a nation to survive, it needs more than 2+ children per female to replace the generation before. There is also many reasons why we lose children before they are grown; and not all females have children. In the US alone, our population has dropped to 1.4 children - we are below the replacement rate. Some nations will never make a come back, for their birth rate is so low, that they are going extinct. Planned Parenthood even addressed this in some of their films that aired on PBS several years ago- that their influence had been so strong in Singapore, that they had to try to encourage people to have children. Our country maintains because of the foreigners that come to this… [cont.]
Answered by Nancy - Wed Jan 28 00:05:53 2009
Q. Lets look at birth rates before and after Roe v Wade. In 1960 the number of births in the United States was 4.258 million. The number dropped to 3.137 million by 1973 when the courts finally told the pro lifers they could no longer violate our right to abortion. After Roe v Wade the birth rate climbed to 4.022 million births. Therefore when pro lifers "claim" that abortion is killing kids, it is simply untrue. The facts show that prior to Roe, the number of births was declining and after Roe the births are increasing. The facts are exactly opposite of what the pro lifers say. Abortion, because it leads to planned births and wanted kids increases the number of live birth, whereas adopting the pro life stance causes lower birth rates and… [cont.]
Asked by Give me Liberty - Tue Jan 27 23:50:50 2009 - - 23 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Here's a news flash - Perhaps you have heard that in order for a nation to survive, it needs more than 2+ children per female to replace the generation before. There is also many reasons why we lose children before they are grown; and not all females have children. In the US alone, our population has dropped to 1.4 children - we are below the replacement rate. Some nations will never make a come back, for their birth rate is so low, that they are going extinct. Planned Parenthood even addressed this in some of their films that aired on PBS several years ago- that their influence had been so strong in Singapore, that they had to try to encourage people to have children. Our country maintains because of the foreigners that come to this… [cont.]
Answered by Nancy - Wed Jan 28 00:05:53 2009
Math test help!!!! 50 point question!!!?
Q. The table gives the population of the united states, in millions for the years 1900-1990? YEAR - Population 1900 - 76 1910 - 92 1920 - 106 1930 -123 1940 -131 1950- 150 1960 - 179 1970- 203 1980 - 227 1990 - 250 A. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to find equation, use that to predict the population for 1990. Compare with the actual figure and try to explain the discrepancy. B. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1970 and 1980 to find an equation, use that to predict the population for 1990.Compare with the actual population. Use this model to predict the population in the years 2000 and 2010.
Asked by Dani - Sun Apr 6 15:34:48 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A. The increase of population from1900 to 1910 was 16 mil which is 21.05% increase. Using that as the percentage in the formula, and 76 as the initial population, the equation is: 76 e^.2105t where t is the number of decades past 1900. The discrepency could be a larger percentage increase between 1900 and 1910 than other decades. B. Using 1970 and 1980 gives a different percentage of increase at 11.82%. The equation now changes to: 203 e^.1182t with t = # of decades so the population prediction is 289.4 mil in 2000 and 325.7 mil. in 2010
Answered by Rusty - Sun Apr 6 20:09:12 2008
Q. The table gives the population of the united states, in millions for the years 1900-1990? YEAR - Population 1900 - 76 1910 - 92 1920 - 106 1930 -123 1940 -131 1950- 150 1960 - 179 1970- 203 1980 - 227 1990 - 250 A. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to find equation, use that to predict the population for 1990. Compare with the actual figure and try to explain the discrepancy. B. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1970 and 1980 to find an equation, use that to predict the population for 1990.Compare with the actual population. Use this model to predict the population in the years 2000 and 2010.
Asked by Dani - Sun Apr 6 15:34:48 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A. The increase of population from1900 to 1910 was 16 mil which is 21.05% increase. Using that as the percentage in the formula, and 76 as the initial population, the equation is: 76 e^.2105t where t is the number of decades past 1900. The discrepency could be a larger percentage increase between 1900 and 1910 than other decades. B. Using 1970 and 1980 gives a different percentage of increase at 11.82%. The equation now changes to: 203 e^.1182t with t = # of decades so the population prediction is 289.4 mil in 2000 and 325.7 mil. in 2010
Answered by Rusty - Sun Apr 6 20:09:12 2008
another Exponential growth and decay question. Please help me!!?
Q. I don't really know what to do with this. I tried doing the slope of the 2 years given but I don't think that's right. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million
Asked by d_kuon - Thu Nov 6 22:30:37 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a) P(1910) = 76 e^10k = 92 k = ln (92/76)/10 So P(2000) = 76 e^100 ln (92/76)/10 = 513.5 b) P(1990) = 227 e^10k = 250 k = ln (250/227)/10 So P(2000) = 227 e^20 ln (250/227)/10 = 275.3
Answered by DANIEL G - Thu Nov 6 23:09:53 2008
Q. I don't really know what to do with this. I tried doing the slope of the 2 years given but I don't think that's right. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) = million
Asked by d_kuon - Thu Nov 6 22:30:37 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. a) P(1910) = 76 e^10k = 92 k = ln (92/76)/10 So P(2000) = 76 e^100 ln (92/76)/10 = 513.5 b) P(1990) = 227 e^10k = 250 k = ln (250/227)/10 So P(2000) = 227 e^20 ln (250/227)/10 = 275.3
Answered by DANIEL G - Thu Nov 6 23:09:53 2008
Would you see how many pages this will be on word?
Q. Thanks, I just don't have microsoft word and want to see if i'm at one page yet or what. If it is times new roman, font size 12, how many pages/ inches down am i on the page: Adoption became a familiar process in the United States in the aftermath of World War II. During WWII and subsequent wars, many families were torn apart and a substantial number of children became orphans. With the advent of birth control and legalized abortion in the 1960's, fewer healthy white babies were available to be adopted, but the number of children of color as orphans remained analogous. According to the 2000 U.S. census, about seventeen percent of orphans were adopted by parents of a different race. In Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Family and… [cont.]
Asked by tired - Mon Nov 17 16:16:02 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You are 1 and 1/3 pages down. Hope this helps!
Answered by mathnerdkid - Mon Nov 17 16:23:53 2008
Q. Thanks, I just don't have microsoft word and want to see if i'm at one page yet or what. If it is times new roman, font size 12, how many pages/ inches down am i on the page: Adoption became a familiar process in the United States in the aftermath of World War II. During WWII and subsequent wars, many families were torn apart and a substantial number of children became orphans. With the advent of birth control and legalized abortion in the 1960's, fewer healthy white babies were available to be adopted, but the number of children of color as orphans remained analogous. According to the 2000 U.S. census, about seventeen percent of orphans were adopted by parents of a different race. In Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Family and… [cont.]
Asked by tired - Mon Nov 17 16:16:02 2008 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You are 1 and 1/3 pages down. Hope this helps!
Answered by mathnerdkid - Mon Nov 17 16:23:53 2008
Have you seen what the Republican Convention in Texas has as it's agenda.?
Q. Another exercise in extremism. That s our take on the new party platform adopted by Texas Republicans at their state convention on June 12 in Dallas. See our analysis of the platform here. The full platform is here. Among the planks: * Separation of church and state is a myth. * Teach junk science in public schools. * Give politicians on State Board of Education instead of teachers and scholars even more power to decide what students should learn. (And give the SBOE authority over colleges and universities, too.) * Promote the independent and sovereign authority of Texas and form a Constitutional State Militia (apparently to protect that sovereignty). * Undermine the national census. * Keep teens ignorant about… [cont.]
Asked by Gorgeoustx Elect Bill White 2010 - Tue Jul 13 18:43:14 2010 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Thank you for providing the egregiously backward, bigoted GOP platform in Texas. How embarrassing for the state that once elected the awesome Anne Richards as Governor, the intelligent Barbara Jordan as Congresswoman, and produced the uniquely unforgettable writer, Molly Ivins. Please read the following for more info on how low the Republicans are attempting to sink:
Answered by Jen - Tue Jul 13 18:50:20 2010
Q. Another exercise in extremism. That s our take on the new party platform adopted by Texas Republicans at their state convention on June 12 in Dallas. See our analysis of the platform here. The full platform is here. Among the planks: * Separation of church and state is a myth. * Teach junk science in public schools. * Give politicians on State Board of Education instead of teachers and scholars even more power to decide what students should learn. (And give the SBOE authority over colleges and universities, too.) * Promote the independent and sovereign authority of Texas and form a Constitutional State Militia (apparently to protect that sovereignty). * Undermine the national census. * Keep teens ignorant about… [cont.]
Asked by Gorgeoustx Elect Bill White 2010 - Tue Jul 13 18:43:14 2010 - - 20 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Thank you for providing the egregiously backward, bigoted GOP platform in Texas. How embarrassing for the state that once elected the awesome Anne Richards as Governor, the intelligent Barbara Jordan as Congresswoman, and produced the uniquely unforgettable writer, Molly Ivins. Please read the following for more info on how low the Republicans are attempting to sink:
Answered by Jen - Tue Jul 13 18:50:20 2010
From Yahoo Answer Search: '1960 United States Census'
Wed Sep 8 19:10:23 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
presstv.ir
Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:09:23 GMT+00:00
Press TV I think he has a somewhat more realistic role of the United States in the world. But I think people who supported Obama with great enthusiasm have reason to ...
library.upenn.edu
1596px x 1257px | 65.40kB
[source page]
of Howard G Brunsman Washington U S Govt Print Off 1952 Van Pelt Library Reference Desk HA201 1950 A2 copies of this volume and other geographic areas are located on 4th floor Census Tract Map Philadelphia 1950 1960 United States Bureau of the Census Census of Population and Housing 1960 Census Tracts Philadelphia pa nj washington U S Govt Print
[Hide]▲
