Ricardo Villalobos was born in the Philippines in 1881 & died in Seattle in 1970. Anyone know more about him?
Q. I'm researching his genealogy for a friend of mine. I have had trouble finding his obituary in newspaper microfilm because I don't know the exact date that he died. Does anyone know this or where I can go to find it out. He does not show up in the Social Security Death Index, or rootsweb, or ancestry.com. Google searches typically bring up stuff about an unrelated Mexican singer of the same name. Is there a (preferably free) place where I can access records from the censuses that the United States took in the Philippines while they were still an American colony? I've tried the National Archives in Washington State. They have everything else including the Panama Canal Zone, but for some reason they don't have the Philippines even… [cont.]
Asked by ARKdeEREH - Thu Mar 13 02:06:31 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Maybe yes or maybe no...You really don't have much for sure to go on! I found this in the S.S.D.I. Born 15 May 1882 Died Washington St Feb 1969 Name : Mike Lobos Unless you have something closer! I can"t believe that this guy worked in this country for many years without a S.S. Card
Answered by Eleph - Sun Mar 16 21:25:03 2008
Q. I'm researching his genealogy for a friend of mine. I have had trouble finding his obituary in newspaper microfilm because I don't know the exact date that he died. Does anyone know this or where I can go to find it out. He does not show up in the Social Security Death Index, or rootsweb, or ancestry.com. Google searches typically bring up stuff about an unrelated Mexican singer of the same name. Is there a (preferably free) place where I can access records from the censuses that the United States took in the Philippines while they were still an American colony? I've tried the National Archives in Washington State. They have everything else including the Panama Canal Zone, but for some reason they don't have the Philippines even… [cont.]
Asked by ARKdeEREH - Thu Mar 13 02:06:31 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Maybe yes or maybe no...You really don't have much for sure to go on! I found this in the S.S.D.I. Born 15 May 1882 Died Washington St Feb 1969 Name : Mike Lobos Unless you have something closer! I can"t believe that this guy worked in this country for many years without a S.S. Card
Answered by Eleph - Sun Mar 16 21:25:03 2008
statistics homework help?
Q. U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the average number of persons per household in the United States for census years between 1850 and 2000 are shown in the following table. Year Per House 1850 5.55 1860 5.28 1870 5.09 1880 5.04 1890 4.93 1900 4.76 1910 4.54 1920 4.34 1930 4.11 1940 3.67 1950 3.37 1960 3.35 1970 3.14 1980 2.76 1990 2.63 2000 2.59 (a) Determine the least squares line for these data. Use the equation of this line to estimate the number of persons per household in the year 2011. (b) What is the slope of the line? (c) Based on the regression line, what would be the predicted persons per household in the year 2300? (d) What is the lowest possible value of… [cont.]
Asked by Erin - Wed Feb 18 12:23:26 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. (a) The least squares regression line is y = 44.392 - 0.0209x where x is the year and the estimate for 2011 would be 2.36 persons. (b) The slope is therefore -0.0209 persons per year. That means the average occupancy is falling by about one person every 50 years. (c) For x = 2300, y = -3.7, which is clearly nonsense. (d) The minimum occupancy could be zero, if everyone was a vagrant and no one ever lived at an address; or 1.0 if everyone has to be listed as living somewhere ! The problem with this analysis arises from the assumption that the relationship is a straight line. Obviously it's not.
Answered by Victor - Wed Feb 18 12:41:44 2009
Q. U.S. Census Bureau estimates of the average number of persons per household in the United States for census years between 1850 and 2000 are shown in the following table. Year Per House 1850 5.55 1860 5.28 1870 5.09 1880 5.04 1890 4.93 1900 4.76 1910 4.54 1920 4.34 1930 4.11 1940 3.67 1950 3.37 1960 3.35 1970 3.14 1980 2.76 1990 2.63 2000 2.59 (a) Determine the least squares line for these data. Use the equation of this line to estimate the number of persons per household in the year 2011. (b) What is the slope of the line? (c) Based on the regression line, what would be the predicted persons per household in the year 2300? (d) What is the lowest possible value of… [cont.]
Asked by Erin - Wed Feb 18 12:23:26 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
A. (a) The least squares regression line is y = 44.392 - 0.0209x where x is the year and the estimate for 2011 would be 2.36 persons. (b) The slope is therefore -0.0209 persons per year. That means the average occupancy is falling by about one person every 50 years. (c) For x = 2300, y = -3.7, which is clearly nonsense. (d) The minimum occupancy could be zero, if everyone was a vagrant and no one ever lived at an address; or 1.0 if everyone has to be listed as living somewhere ! The problem with this analysis arises from the assumption that the relationship is a straight line. Obviously it's not.
Answered by Victor - Wed Feb 18 12:41:44 2009
Government in America ?
Q. 1.The increase in the quantity of information has a.Led to the society of political masters. b.Created the most informed citizenry of any democracy in history c.Fallen far short of its democratic potential d.Produced greater competency in citizenry e.Given rise to the informed society 2.The media usually focus on the ___ of politics a.Who b.What c.When d.How e.Why 3.Which of the following is NOT a component of the policy system a.People b.Linkage institution c.Policy d.Criminal justice institutions e.Policymaking institutions 4.The Bill of Rights was adopted primarily in response to a.The Spanish Inquisition b.British abuses of the colonists civil liberties c.The abuses committed by the United States Continental Army during the… [cont.]
Asked by track star - Tue Oct 6 09:09:59 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
Q. 1.The increase in the quantity of information has a.Led to the society of political masters. b.Created the most informed citizenry of any democracy in history c.Fallen far short of its democratic potential d.Produced greater competency in citizenry e.Given rise to the informed society 2.The media usually focus on the ___ of politics a.Who b.What c.When d.How e.Why 3.Which of the following is NOT a component of the policy system a.People b.Linkage institution c.Policy d.Criminal justice institutions e.Policymaking institutions 4.The Bill of Rights was adopted primarily in response to a.The Spanish Inquisition b.British abuses of the colonists civil liberties c.The abuses committed by the United States Continental Army during the… [cont.]
Asked by track star - Tue Oct 6 09:09:59 2009 - - 2 Answers - 0 Comments
Math test help!!!! 50 point question!!!?
Q. The table gives the population of the united states, in millions for the years 1900-1990? YEAR - Population 1900 - 76 1910 - 92 1920 - 106 1930 -123 1940 -131 1950- 150 1960 - 179 1970- 203 1980 - 227 1990 - 250 A. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to find equation, use that to predict the population for 1990. Compare with the actual figure and try to explain the discrepancy. B. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1970 and 1980 to find an equation, use that to predict the population for 1990.Compare with the actual population. Use this model to predict the population in the years 2000 and 2010.
Asked by Dani - Sun Apr 6 15:34:48 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A. The increase of population from1900 to 1910 was 16 mil which is 21.05% increase. Using that as the percentage in the formula, and 76 as the initial population, the equation is: 76 e^.2105t where t is the number of decades past 1900. The discrepency could be a larger percentage increase between 1900 and 1910 than other decades. B. Using 1970 and 1980 gives a different percentage of increase at 11.82%. The equation now changes to: 203 e^.1182t with t = # of decades so the population prediction is 289.4 mil in 2000 and 325.7 mil. in 2010
Answered by Rusty - Sun Apr 6 20:09:12 2008
Q. The table gives the population of the united states, in millions for the years 1900-1990? YEAR - Population 1900 - 76 1910 - 92 1920 - 106 1930 -123 1940 -131 1950- 150 1960 - 179 1970- 203 1980 - 227 1990 - 250 A. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to find equation, use that to predict the population for 1990. Compare with the actual figure and try to explain the discrepancy. B. Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1970 and 1980 to find an equation, use that to predict the population for 1990.Compare with the actual population. Use this model to predict the population in the years 2000 and 2010.
Asked by Dani - Sun Apr 6 15:34:48 2008 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. A. The increase of population from1900 to 1910 was 16 mil which is 21.05% increase. Using that as the percentage in the formula, and 76 as the initial population, the equation is: 76 e^.2105t where t is the number of decades past 1900. The discrepency could be a larger percentage increase between 1900 and 1910 than other decades. B. Using 1970 and 1980 gives a different percentage of increase at 11.82%. The equation now changes to: 203 e^.1182t with t = # of decades so the population prediction is 289.4 mil in 2000 and 325.7 mil. in 2010
Answered by Rusty - Sun Apr 6 20:09:12 2008
Math question (linear equations):?
Q. According to the census, the population of the United States was about 151 million in 1950 and 249 million in 1990. 1. Write a linear equation to model the population (in millions) of the United States t years after 1950. 2.Use the equation from #1 to find the population of the US in 1970. 3. Use the same equation to predict the population of the US in 2010. Thanks so much Thanks Ron, but I have a question. I got 20/49 for the slope because I did (1990-1950) / (249-151). Does it make a difference which values I set as x and which ones I use for y?
Asked by C T - Wed Mar 4 09:49:26 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You are asked to find an equation of the form y = at + b given the two points (0, 151) and (40, 249) (since 1990 is 40 years after 1950) The slope is (249 - 151) / (40 - 0) = 98/40 = 49/20 The y-intercept is the y-value when t = 0; we have this as 151. Therefore, the equation of the line is y = (49/20)t + 151 I leave #2 and 3 to you (they require only evaulation of the linear equation obtained in #1).
Answered by Ron W - Wed Mar 4 12:15:15 2009
Q. According to the census, the population of the United States was about 151 million in 1950 and 249 million in 1990. 1. Write a linear equation to model the population (in millions) of the United States t years after 1950. 2.Use the equation from #1 to find the population of the US in 1970. 3. Use the same equation to predict the population of the US in 2010. Thanks so much Thanks Ron, but I have a question. I got 20/49 for the slope because I did (1990-1950) / (249-151). Does it make a difference which values I set as x and which ones I use for y?
Asked by C T - Wed Mar 4 09:49:26 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. You are asked to find an equation of the form y = at + b given the two points (0, 151) and (40, 249) (since 1990 is 40 years after 1950) The slope is (249 - 151) / (40 - 0) = 98/40 = 49/20 The y-intercept is the y-value when t = 0; we have this as 151. Therefore, the equation of the line is y = (49/20)t + 151 I leave #2 and 3 to you (they require only evaulation of the linear equation obtained in #1).
Answered by Ron W - Wed Mar 4 12:15:15 2009
Who will black women marry?
Q. For every 100 black women there 70 black men, and this does not even take into account the prison population!!! According to the 2000 census, black men enter interracial marriages at a higher rate -- 9.7 percent -- than any other racial or gender group except Asian women. That's twice the rate of black women. Between 1970 and 2001, the overall marriage rate in the United States declined by 17 percent; for black people, that drop was 34 percent... There are going to be a lot of lonely black women if things dont change...
Asked by Harman P - Wed Mar 26 13:21:11 2008 - - 10 Answers - 1 Comments
A. We will (and have already) marry whomever we want to, regardless of race or country of origin. I would hope that everyone will marry for love, but whatever their individual reasons are I hope in the end they are happy.
Answered by tetlitea - Wed Mar 26 13:39:46 2008
Q. For every 100 black women there 70 black men, and this does not even take into account the prison population!!! According to the 2000 census, black men enter interracial marriages at a higher rate -- 9.7 percent -- than any other racial or gender group except Asian women. That's twice the rate of black women. Between 1970 and 2001, the overall marriage rate in the United States declined by 17 percent; for black people, that drop was 34 percent... There are going to be a lot of lonely black women if things dont change...
Asked by Harman P - Wed Mar 26 13:21:11 2008 - - 10 Answers - 1 Comments
A. We will (and have already) marry whomever we want to, regardless of race or country of origin. I would hope that everyone will marry for love, but whatever their individual reasons are I hope in the end they are happy.
Answered by tetlitea - Wed Mar 26 13:39:46 2008
Are interracial marriages on the rise?
Q. The number of interracial marriages in the United States, although varying by region, has been on the rise: In 1970, there were 310,000 documented cases, representing 0.7% of all marriages In 1980, there were 651,000, representing 1.3% of all marriages In 1992, there were 1,161,000, representing 2.2% of all marriages *Source U.S. Census Bureau. at In my opinion the figures are quite small. When one sees the attention that is given interracial celebrity couples one would be led to believe that the general figures are higher than those above. So are the individuals interested in interracial dating going to continue rising or will the numbers reach a certain point and stop because of the fact that individuals have different… [cont.]
Asked by Princess of the Sun. - Sat Aug 18 07:22:02 2007 - - 18 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well first of all your stats show you've done the research and speak for themselves! But, I live in the UK and I think they are. the reason may be because of all the immigration of people from one country to another and the growing acceptance of other cultures it is inevitable thatthere will be a rise in inter-racial mariage, but to get a true picture we would also have to see the population rises for the individual country and relate it in proportion to that to get a true and fuller picture of the situation.
Answered by footyfan_stoke - Sat Aug 18 07:31:45 2007
Q. The number of interracial marriages in the United States, although varying by region, has been on the rise: In 1970, there were 310,000 documented cases, representing 0.7% of all marriages In 1980, there were 651,000, representing 1.3% of all marriages In 1992, there were 1,161,000, representing 2.2% of all marriages *Source U.S. Census Bureau. at In my opinion the figures are quite small. When one sees the attention that is given interracial celebrity couples one would be led to believe that the general figures are higher than those above. So are the individuals interested in interracial dating going to continue rising or will the numbers reach a certain point and stop because of the fact that individuals have different… [cont.]
Asked by Princess of the Sun. - Sat Aug 18 07:22:02 2007 - - 18 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Well first of all your stats show you've done the research and speak for themselves! But, I live in the UK and I think they are. the reason may be because of all the immigration of people from one country to another and the growing acceptance of other cultures it is inevitable thatthere will be a rise in inter-racial mariage, but to get a true picture we would also have to see the population rises for the individual country and relate it in proportion to that to get a true and fuller picture of the situation.
Answered by footyfan_stoke - Sat Aug 18 07:31:45 2007
Calculus word problem?
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) =___million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) =___million
Asked by Mlukm - Wed May 20 23:39:25 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. don't see why this is a calc problem Oo. Exponential model is A = Pe^(rt) P is how much you start with. A is howmuch you end up with. and t is the amount of time passed. So from 1900 to 1910, the amount of time passed is 10 years, and 76 is how much you start with (P) 92 is how much you end with (A) so you have 92 = 76*e^(r*10) Solve this for r. (I'm too lazy.) and then replace that value of r into your equation. Now you have the power to predict what the population will be in 2000. Just use the started population in 1910 as you (A) and leave P as your variable. Use t = 90, (90 years from 1910 to 2000) and the rate you found in the first problem. The only variable you should have left is P, which is your prediction… [cont.]
Answered by Ken - Wed May 20 23:49:03 2009
Q. The table gives the population of the United States, in millions, for the years 1900-2000. YearPopulation 190076 191092 1920106 1930123 1940131 1950150 1960179 1970203 1980227 1990250 2000275 (a) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1900 and 1910 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) =___million (b) Use the exponential model and the census figures for 1980 and 1990 to predict the population in 2000. P(2000) =___million
Asked by Mlukm - Wed May 20 23:39:25 2009 - - 1 Answers - 0 Comments
A. don't see why this is a calc problem Oo. Exponential model is A = Pe^(rt) P is how much you start with. A is howmuch you end up with. and t is the amount of time passed. So from 1900 to 1910, the amount of time passed is 10 years, and 76 is how much you start with (P) 92 is how much you end with (A) so you have 92 = 76*e^(r*10) Solve this for r. (I'm too lazy.) and then replace that value of r into your equation. Now you have the power to predict what the population will be in 2000. Just use the started population in 1910 as you (A) and leave P as your variable. Use t = 90, (90 years from 1910 to 2000) and the rate you found in the first problem. The only variable you should have left is P, which is your prediction… [cont.]
Answered by Ken - Wed May 20 23:49:03 2009
Who will black women marry?
Q. Who will black women marry? For every 100 black women there 70 black men, and this does not even take into account the prison population!!! According to the 2000 census, black men enter interracial marriages at a higher rate -- 9.7 percent -- than any other racial or gender group except Asian women. That's twice the rate of black women. Besides that men from other races find black women less attractive from other races... Between 1970 and 2001, the overall marriage rate in the United States declined by 17 percent; for black people, that drop was 34 percent... There are going to be a lot of lonely black women if things dont change... The problem is that they aren't getting married you retards...
Asked by Harman P - Thu Mar 27 15:03:04 2008 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Black women are free to marry whomever they choose, just like any other woman. 2D
Answered by 2D - Thu Mar 27 16:51:01 2008
Q. Who will black women marry? For every 100 black women there 70 black men, and this does not even take into account the prison population!!! According to the 2000 census, black men enter interracial marriages at a higher rate -- 9.7 percent -- than any other racial or gender group except Asian women. That's twice the rate of black women. Besides that men from other races find black women less attractive from other races... Between 1970 and 2001, the overall marriage rate in the United States declined by 17 percent; for black people, that drop was 34 percent... There are going to be a lot of lonely black women if things dont change... The problem is that they aren't getting married you retards...
Asked by Harman P - Thu Mar 27 15:03:04 2008 - - 16 Answers - 0 Comments
A. Black women are free to marry whomever they choose, just like any other woman. 2D
Answered by 2D - Thu Mar 27 16:51:01 2008
From Yahoo Answer Search: '1970 United States Census'
Wed Sep 8 09:23:50 2010 [ refresh local cache ]
[Hide]▼
idsa.in
Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:04:56 GMT+00:00
Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses As a permanent member of the UNSC, China can veto any resolution against Fiji brought by the United States and Great Britain. ...
freebirdbooks.com
888px x 750px | 37.20kB
[source page]
which keeps employers from installing safety devices on dangerous machines the mania for speed on the highways and on city streets and carelessness both on the street and in the home On the basis of a careful analysis of the 1940 census Stuart Chase predicts that the population of the United States will reach a peak of between 140 and 150 million in 1970 and will
www2.macleans.ca
Colby Cosh
Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:34:16 GM
b) censuses themselves are inherently illibertarian, but not so much so that they haven't been permanent, constitutionally entrenched features of the . United States. , Canada, and most other similarly disposed liberal democracies;. c) ethical arguments against the long form are . ... Forced sterilization of roughly 3000 through the Alberta Eugenics Board from 1928 to . 1970. , The Sexual Sterilization Act of 1933 in British Columbia and 33 U.S. States from 1897 to 1963. ...
[Hide]▲
